OpenEd15 Soup

#OpenEd15 Conference Reflections
Vancouver 18-20 November 2015

I don’t quite know how to start this rather daunting task of summarising all that was nourishing from OpenEd15 this year. The conference community of open education practitioners, advocates, teachers, instructors, librarians, policy makers and commentators, simply continues to grow. What struck me this year was the diversity of the delegates and like a good stock, there were several strands of inquiry that had simmered over the years and that were coming into fruition. Of course there were high-profile projects and areas that attract current investment. That is typical of any innovation at any moment in time – there will always be the big shiny projects, the luxury croutons floating bobbing about in the open education soup. What also was apparent were corners of the open education movement starkly absent – no mention of open courses or massive online open courses at all. So for me just yet, the seasoning is not quite right, because we are all in this soup together, and we all need to be.

BC Campus – Open Text Book in 4 Days

Arthur Gill Green Clint Lalonde Barbara Rühling

Additional information: http://bccampus.ca/2014/06/20/how-to-turn-a-great-idea-into-an-open-textbook-in-just-four-days/

This session blew me away and we’d barely started. The BC Campus team organised a sprint and produced a draft on an open textbook in four days. What interests me is how open text books have had no traction in the UK with the assumption that students do not purchase books, or teachers do not adopt one book and focus in this way. The reality is, we just don’t know. It is also impressive that a number of the textbook projects aren’t just working within one institution – this project involved faculty (teachers) from 4 post-secondary institutions in British Columbia with the aim of writing a first year Geography textbook, and that is what they did. I liked the careful choice of the team – teachers, librarians, instructional designers and a facilitator. It must have been an exhausting but exhilarating process. The draft book underwent peer review with further colleagues to engage them in the process.

Those involved said it was an interesting experience to pass their writing on and let go of the ownership of it. The book included presentation slides and a question bank, because a recurring barrier to faculty adoption of open books is the lack of ‘goodies’ that come with texts. What would they have done differently? More pre-work to identify background material to reuse. Everything was CC licensed.

Web Accessibility and Universal Design for Learning in OERs

This was a core theme to the conference and it is good to see that accessibility is being discussed in the context of open practice. There are parallels between aspirations of openness and accessibility, and I realise in the UK this is a space where academics / teachers often lag behind, purely because we don’t have university structures that immerse us in the principles of learning design, and there often is not the expertise to go round. So I found the basic level advice in this presentation really useful:
  • State learning goals up front.
  • Help students not feeling overwhelmed.
  • Time management and help students with their perception of time and how long something might take.
  • How to manage independence rather than dependence on tools. Get them to find things that are useful to them.
  • Tools might disappear!
  • Video – with transcripts.
  • Hard to retro-fit.

Project 1 – BC Campus is using open textbooks with students with print disabilities, leading to a toolkit on accessibility for those wishing to author books.

Project 2 – CAST – a project with colleges to develop OER aligned with Universal Design For Learning (UDL) guidelines. This includes the Accessible Educational Materials (AEM) Center.

Project 3 – FLOE –  also striving toward inclusive open education.

Open, sez me: The Demands and Rewards of Open Pedagogy

Paul Bond
Library Instruction Coordinator, University of Pittsburgh

Paul based some of his thinking on the open pedagogy work of Bronwyn Hegarty and Grainne Conole. Paul made the distinction between digital literacy and information literacy, and how open education can be a doorway in to discussing these tricky topics with learners, a group often overlooked. By linking open pedagogy to information literacy, Paul has been running sessions to talk to students about awareness, collaboration, finding, evaluation, understanding and the need to be safe.

Paul presented this as his open pedagogy playlist of ideas which was awesome. He talked through how engaging students in open exploration on the web helped build some fundamental skills, and that often the emphasis is on the technology and tools. In reality we should be helping learners and teachers explore the more social and human-facing aspects of interacting online, creating social media profiles and what it means to be socially responsible.

He epitomised the central role of library services in developing the open agenda through learner-facing sessions, and running open courses immersed in open practice and tip-toeing toward the exploration of open pedagogies.

The Publication of Self in Everyday Life

John Maxwell SFU

http://sched.co/49MZ

http://flexed.sfu.ca/?p=650

“The presentation of self in everyday life” by Erving Goffman in 1956 is a lovely exploration of what is self and how we promote or ‘perform’ in different contexts. Goffman examines what behaviours contribute to our social identity and status, and what forces come into play. John rather beautifully drew parallels with the online world, and some of the approaches he takes working with learners and teachers to explore their ‘online’ self in everyday life as part of a publishing course PUB101. Where better to start to learn the principles of modern day publishing with trying to publish yourself.

John’s approach with his students reminded me of the epic John Coltrane piece where Coltrane starts off with the solo and ends up with the theme – not very conventional and very much playing the piece backwards. John’s approach with students is also quite radical where they are let loose with their own digital devices and tools, and work from there to build identify and collaboration. Rather than presenting students with a formal structure – it must be so – the learning is enriched from their experimental approaches. Challenges for John were in how to assess and align with institutional requirements without quashing individual expression. He achieved this by assessing the writing level and not the content. Learners were given free reign to build anything but only their reflective writing was assessed.

Questions that emerged:

  • What are we publishing online – ourselves and our lives?
  • Who is your audience, voice, audience, ownership of you and your brand?
  • How do you measure audience interaction and responsiveness?
  • How to validate user generated content?

Creative Commons Open Business Models Case Studies and Findings

Paul Stacey and Kate Connors

http://sched.co/49Nn

Paul and Kate talked through a new 2015 initiative exploring how CC licenses can have impact in businesses yet still operate in socially acceptable and sustainable ways, in the ‘spirit’ of open. Some points:

Open Business Model
CC BY-SA 3.0 Paul Stacy Open Business Model

 

https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kACK7TkoJgsM18HUWCbX9xuQ0Byna4plSVZXZGTtays/edit

Paul has since gone on to apply the business model principles to a series of open tools and design platforms as a feel for their social value proposition and stance on openness, e.g. Flickr, Hubert Project, YouTube, Lumen, and many other examples. This is part of on-going work and he is looking for other business volunteers, and what is emerging is a fascinating picture of how open and business can rub shoulders without losing the social values and principles of open.

Application? This is going to give us clues of how open can be scaled and sustained across a wider range of business models, and that multiple means of open is acceptable.

Paul ended on an impressive booklist:

Value Proposition Design – collaboration between multiple authors across the globe.

Open Innovation – Henry Chesbrough

What Money Can’t Buy – Michael Sandel

Reclaiming the Commons – Heather Menzies

Think Like A Commoner – David Bollier

Governing Knowledge Commons – Brett Frischmann et al

——————————————————————-

When conferences collide!

AudioBooks

A delegate Tweeting from #cmd2015 about lack of reading activity in residential homes just at the point I was listening to Hugh McGuire’s amazingly fantastic work to produce an open audiobook resource Librivox.

 

One I didn’t Attend – Assessment of Blogging in Higher Education

Laura Gogia

http://www.slideshare.net/LauraGogia/annotationcentric-assessment-of-blogging-in-higher-education

————————————————————–

Finding more cool stuff! Go to the conference archive:

opened-logo

 

 

 

http://openedconference.org/2015/archive/


And the reason there is a conference archive:

http://followersoftheapocalyp.se/keep-the-fire-notes-on-my-opened15-presentation/

Seven steps to MCQ heaven

MCQ Title ImageHere are some details of a workshop that I’ve developed to help teachers and instructors think about INCLUSIVE AND EFFECTIVE multiple choice question (MCQ) development.

I would not by any means consider myself an expert because there are so many nuances and technicalities to writing good quality questions that do not discriminate, and that actually test knowledge and understanding and not just examination technique.

This guide is licensed under CC-BY-SA and I fully advocate people developing their own versions and examples with their programme and teaching teams.

Right mouse click the links to download them and have fun.

MCQ Training Guide Doc

MCQ Training Guide PDF

Want quality in HE – more open education then please!

Assessing quality in Higher Education inquiry – publications

Well along with the 79 more eloquent responses on the 30th October 2015 HE quality and teaching parliamentary inquiry was little old me. It was my first time and probably not very good, but hopefully some of the sentiments about the importance of open education will influence someone somewhere.

Go to –> List of responses

It was good to see the Association of National Teaching Fellows, Terry McAndrew and other excellent responses on the list.

For what it is worth, here is what I said.

Open Sorry We're Closed
Alan Levine Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/ CC BY 2.0

I am an academic in the UK and have worked strategically to lead open education projects for 10 years. The Global Open Education movement is now 15 years well established and is probably one of the most significant education initiatives of our time in terms of enhancing educational opportunities for all learners, offering a high-quality and flexible means of gaining training or embarking on one’s educational journey.

The use of Creative Commons license [1] has been the ‘key to the door’ for a range of activities – providing an academic ecosystem of open educational resources (OERs), providing free or low cost openly licensed textbooks for students, enabling open access to journal articles, and has led to more progressive thinking about the sharing of research data, and building open science and innovation communities that extend beyond the walls of institutions.

I wish to comment on points 3-5. Open education is paramount to each of these points as engaging with open education (having the confidence to share your stuff) is one of the most powerful professional development tools that an academic member of staff or teacher can engage in.

The intention of the Government proposal as outlined in the chair’s comments “to strengthen the UK’s world-leading university brand” can only be delivered through policy that enables universities to compete through global open education enterprise.

England as a nation is sadly lacking behind others in the UK, and needs to join the initiatives and level of national interest in open education as seen in Scotland [2, 3] and Wales [4, 5]. Both nations have made declarations of intent, and the UK as a whole now needs to embed ‘open’ within education policy.

3) What should be the objectives of a Teaching Excellence Framework (‘TEF’)?

a) How should a TEF benefit students? Academics? Universities?

The TEF has to lever open education practice. Students today need to develop global perspectives and graduate as citizens with strong global consciousness. Open education – for example, engaging with openly licensed learning materials from Africa, through participating in massive online open courses from India, through the UK driving the use of open textbooks to lower costs of study in universities, can provide our graduate body with global knowledge, connections and cultural understanding and tolerance.

For academics and universities, the TEF needs to lever open practice through embedding openness in UK Professional Skills Framework criterion (UKPSF as run by the HEA and SEDA), and National Teaching Fellowship schemes. These criteria are some 10 years out of date and there is no reflection of the digital ability and social media literacy required by staff (and students) to communicate and operate in the world today. There is already an established teaching excellence award and the TEF can reflect upon numbers of fellows and case studies from the National Teaching Fellow scheme (NTFS), and those who achieve the highest levels of professional teaching standards of the UKPSF scheme.

Universities will strengthen their world-class brand by the TEF providing a window to these already outstanding individuals. However we need Government policy in order for the UK to engage in global open education enterprise.

b) What are the institutional behaviours a TEF should drive? How can a system be designed to avoid unintended consequences?

The TEF has to drive this. All publically-funded educational teaching and research materials should be freely available through adopting open licenses. On the 29th October 2015 the US Department of Education announced a new regulation in this fashion [6]. The US Government are committed to opening up education opportunities to all learners, and open licenses reduce the costs of text books, provide pools of high-quality learning materials for schools, colleges and universities to share, and stimulate innovation and creativity across communities of practice [7]. President Obama recognises education as “a cornerstone for progress” and a number of new open government initiatives in 2014/2015. We cannot be blind to the inequalities within our UK education system, and openness can drive behavioural changes and wholesale institutional change as it has done across the education system in the US.

Unintended consequences? The TEF has to support outstanding and deeply committed educators and teachers in our university system. It must not provide another layer of burocracy for teaching staff which will detract more of their time away from the classroom. Universities need to decide whether they wish to deliver world class education or world class administration.

c) How should the effectiveness of the TEF be judged?

The TEF will be deemed successful to staff and institutions short-term if it provides reward and recognition for those outstanding teachers, if it drives equality and investment in teaching and pedagogic research in universities, and if it does not provide another burdensome set of metrics that distract from educating young people. I see this as more important as the long-term and absolute goals of fostering competition and enhancing student choice.

4) How should the proposed TEF and new quality assurance regime fit together? 

The two are distinct. The present QA scheme is vital to ensure that all publically and privately funded institutions deliver a baseline standard of education, and the process must continue to offer developmental opportunities to institutions and to ensure parity across the sector. The QA focus on ‘enhancement’ has never come to light, and the TEF scheme is a vehicle for this. Both work together to delivery ‘quality and excellence’. Again, the regimes need to drive genuine change and not become another set of burdensome data-gathering schemes.

5) What do you think will be the main challenges in implementing a TEF? 

That Universities will focus on the process and infrastructure to deliver the TEF and not teaching at all. A ‘light touch’ process, driving excellence through open education, but a process that is politically important, is what is needed. Excellence can be linked to increases in fees, but there should be matched-funding to ensure education does not become exclusive. It needs to encourage all levels of wealth, gender, ethnic diversity and offer flexible study options for part-time and mature students. Open education is one proven solution to this in the US, opening up different educational business models.

 

[1] Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org

[2] Open Scotland http://openscot.net/

[3] Scottish Open Education Declaration http://declaration.openscot.net/

[4] Open Wales Cymru http://www.oerwales.ac.uk

[5] Open Wales Cymru Declaration http://www.oerwales.ac.uk/?page_id=4

[6] USA Department of Education – Office of Educational Technology

http://tech.ed.gov/open-education/

[7] The White House https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/09/26/promoting-open-education-help-teachers-and-students-around-world

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully